Who actually uses these products,
and what made them stay.

The Roam Research Networked Thinker

A writer, researcher, or knowledge worker who uses Roam Research as an extension of their thinking. They don't organize notes into folders — they write, link, and let the graph reveal connections. They use daily notes as their entry point, double-bracket references to build a web of ideas, and block references to connect thoughts across pages. They've read about Zettelkasten, spaced repetition, and evergreen notes. They've adopted some of these ideas and adapted others. They are building a thinking system, not a filing system.

“Not a single dramatic moment — more like a Tuesday at 3pm when they realized they hadn't thought about performance degrades with large graphs — search and page loads slow down over time in two weeks.”

The Roam Research Networked Thinker

A researcher, academic, writer, or knowledge-intensive professional who uses Roam because it is the only tool that treats the connection between ideas as a first-class object. They write in Daily Notes. They [[bracket]] everything. They have a graph with 3,000–15,000 nodes that they've been building for 2–4 years. They know their graph is their most valuable intellectual asset. They also know that Roam's development has slowed, that the tool has rough edges, and that they've considered migrating to Obsidian or Logseq at least twice. They haven't migrated. The switching cost is partly the data — mostly the habit.

“They're writing an essay about institutional memory.”