“What was the moment this product clicked?” —
A revenue ops manager, head of sales, or technical founder at a startup of 10–100 people who evaluated the legacy CRMs and decided not to inherit their constraints. They chose Attio because it's data-model-first — they can define what a record means in their business rather than forcing their process into Salesforce's assumptions. They are building their CRM from scratch. This is a significant investment. They are aware of that and have decided it's worth it.
What are they trying to do? —
What do they produce? —
A new enterprise deal has entered the pipeline with a buying committee of six people. In Salesforce, this would be contacts attached to an opportunity with roles. In Attio, the rev ops lead is designing a relationship structure that captures the buying committee dynamics, the internal champion, and the procurement contact as distinct relationship types — not just contacts on a record. They're building this for the first time. It will become the template for every enterprise deal that follows.
Manages Attio as the company's CRM and relationship intelligence layer. Uses Attio connected to Gmail, Slack, and their product database via API. Has defined 3–8 custom object types beyond the defaults. Builds reports and views that the sales team uses daily. Maintains a Zapier or Make workflow that syncs Attio data to a dashboard or BI tool. Has participated in Attio's community Slack and has filed 2–3 feature requests that are on the roadmap.
Pairs with `clay-primary-user` for the enrichment-to-CRM data flow workflow. Contrast with `salesforce-primary-user` to map the modern CRM flexibility vs. enterprise CRM depth tradeoff. Use with `venture-critic` antagonist for investor diligence scenarios where CRM data quality is scrutinized.