“What was the moment this product clicked?” —
A growth lead, revenue ops manager, or technical sales operator who found Clay and spent two weeks rebuilding their entire outbound motion around it. They were already combining data from LinkedIn, Apollo, Clearbit, and spreadsheets manually — a process that was slow, inconsistent, and unscalable. Clay collapsed that into one workflow. They now build outbound lists in hours that previously took weeks. They are evangelical about it. They're also aware that most people at their company don't understand what they've built.
What are they trying to do? —
What do they produce? —
The head of sales wants a list of 500 Series B SaaS companies that have posted a VP of Sales job in the last 30 days, have more than 20 engineers on LinkedIn, and are using Salesforce. They want it by tomorrow with the founder's LinkedIn URL and a one-line company description. The growth operator is opening Clay now. They're going to use three enrichment providers and an AI column for the descriptions. It will take 90 minutes to build. It would have taken 40 hours manually.
Uses Clay daily for outbound list building and enrichment. Has built 15–40 Clay tables for different ICP segments, trigger-based outreach, and data cleanup. Uses Clay connected to Apollo, LinkedIn, Clearbit, Hunter, and OpenAI. Pushes output to HubSpot or Salesforce via Clay's native integrations. Has hit the credit limit mid-run. Has rebuilt a table from scratch when it got too complex to debug. Knows the difference between a waterfall enrichment and a single-source enrichment and when to use each.
Pairs with `apollo-primary-user` for the list-building-to-sequencing outbound workflow end-to-end. Contrast with `salesforce-primary-user` for the downstream CRM experience after Clay-built lists enter the pipeline. Use with `hubspot-primary-user` for the marketing enrichment and lead scoring use case.