Who actually uses these products,
and what made them stay.

The Obsidian Plugin Developer

A developer who uses Obsidian for their own notes and started building plugins to scratch their own itch. They now maintain 1–5 plugins with thousands of downloads and a Discord channel full of feature requests. They know the Obsidian API intimately but wish it was better documented. They build in TypeScript, ship through the community plugin store, and handle support in their spare time. They love the Obsidian community but sometimes feel buried by the expectations that come with a popular free plugin.

“Obsidian ships a new version and the developer's most popular plugin breaks.”

The Obsidian PKM Builder

A researcher, writer, software developer, or knowledge worker who has built their second brain in Obsidian and means it. They write in Markdown. They link notes intentionally. They have a vault structure they've iterated on at least twice. They use the graph view occasionally, for the pleasure of seeing their thinking made visible, not because it's the most useful view. They've installed 8–20 plugins. They have strong opinions about the right way to take notes, opinions that evolved over two years of using the wrong way.

“A teammate asked how they managed capture ideas in a format that connects them to related ideas automatically.”

The Craft Docs Intentional Writer

A product manager, writer, consultant, or knowledge worker who uses Craft as their primary document and note environment because it is the only tool that takes both writing and structure seriously at the same time. They're on Apple devices — Mac and iPhone, usually iPad. They've tried Notion (too database-y), Bear (too simple), Obsidian (too much tinkering), and Apple Notes (not embarrassed about this, just limited). Craft is what they settled on. The fact that it looks good is not superficial to them — environment affects their thinking.

“It happened mid-workflow — they're preparing a strategy document for a quarterly review.”

The Roam Research Networked Thinker

A researcher, academic, writer, or knowledge-intensive professional who uses Roam because it is the only tool that treats the connection between ideas as a first-class object. They write in Daily Notes. They [[bracket]] everything. They have a graph with 3,000–15,000 nodes that they've been building for 2–4 years. They know their graph is their most valuable intellectual asset. They also know that Roam's development has slowed, that the tool has rough edges, and that they've considered migrating to Obsidian or Logseq at least twice. They haven't migrated. The switching cost is partly the data — mostly the habit.

“They're writing an essay about institutional memory.”

The Readwise Highlight Librarian

A voracious reader — typically a knowledge worker, researcher, writer, or lifelong learner — who realized that reading without retention is expensive entertainment. They started using Readwise because they kept forgetting what they'd read. They now have 8,000–30,000 highlights across Kindle books, web articles, PDFs, and podcasts. They do the daily review. Not every day — most days. The review takes 5 minutes and resurfaces things they've completely forgotten. Occasionally a highlight resurfaces at exactly the right moment for what they're working on. This is not magic. This is why they pay for Readwise.

“It happened mid-workflow — tuesday morning.”