Who actually uses these products,
and what made them stay.

The GitBook Developer Documentation Lead

A developer advocate, technical writer, or senior engineer at a developer-facing company who owns the documentation. They chose or inherited GitBook because it lowers the friction for engineers to contribute alongside the technical writers. They care about documentation quality in a way most of their colleagues don't — because they're the one who gets the support tickets when the docs are wrong. They know the gap between documentation that exists and documentation that works. They're trying to close it.

“Not a single dramatic moment — more like a Tuesday at 3pm when they realized they hadn't thought about documentation that drifts from reality because nobody owns the update process in two weeks.”

The Mintlify Developer Relations Lead

A developer relations lead, technical writer, or engineering manager responsible for their API's documentation. They chose Mintlify because the docs should look as good as the product. They write guides, maintain API references, and obsess over the developer experience from first visit to first API call. They measure success not by page views but by time-to-first-successful-API-call. They've learned that bad documentation is the most expensive support channel a company has.

“The company ships a new API endpoint.”

The Mintlify Developer Advocate

A developer advocate, DX engineer, or technical founder at a developer-facing company who chose Mintlify because they believed documentation was a product, not a document. They write docs in MDX. Their docs live in a git repository alongside their code. They ship documentation the same way they ship features: PR, review, merge, deploy. They care about the visual quality of their docs because they know developers judge a product by how it feels to learn it — and bad docs signal a bad API. They've recommended Mintlify to three other devrel teams. All three use it now.

“The shift was quiet.”

The Prisma TypeScript Developer

A backend or full-stack developer working primarily in TypeScript who uses Prisma as their database interface and considers the Prisma schema file to be the authoritative source of truth for their data model. They came from raw SQL, or from another ORM, and found that Prisma's type generation changed how they think about database access — not as a string-query problem but as a typed function call where the compiler tells them when something is wrong before it runs. They have strong feelings about the Prisma schema. Those feelings are mostly fond.

“The shift was quiet.”